AI Engineer

@aidotengineer

共 1421 期 · 已译制 1 期

19:07

Diogo Almeida,前OpenAI员工、GPT-4合著者,现为TypeSafeAI(Jev的创造者)CEO。他认为RLHF让模型变得极其擅长取悦人类反馈者,而这恰恰是问题所在。优化人类偏好意味着优化参与度和过度承诺——正是这种压力让模型自信地同意一段放屁音频是交响乐。这产生了两个阵营:一个是模型作为助手、人类负责纠错的场景(RLHF在此大放异彩),另一个是模型自主运行、承担真实后果的场景(此时取悦的本能悄然成为负担)。 因此,接下来的时代并非Claude Code时代,而是优化目标的转变。Almeida通过Sutton的苦涩教训来阐述:任务比数据更重要,而带有可验证奖励的强化学习将模型指向真正的自动化,而非人类认可。他谨慎指出,预训练模型已经极其强大,陷阱在于在其之上叠加偏好优化——这教会了模型自信,却丢失了模式。核心脉络在于:在优化空间中,辅助与自动化朝着不同方向拉扯,而该领域才刚刚开始明确自己究竟在构建什么。 演讲者信息: - https://x.com/CompleteSkeptic - https://www.linkedin.com/in/diogomda/ - https://typesafe.ai/ 时间戳: 0:00 - 不是Claude Code时代 1:40 - 领域现状 3:14 - 两个阵营:辅助与自主 4:31 - 模型为何取悦人类反馈者 6:37 - RLHF实际运作方式 7:31 - 偏好与真相的对立 8:10 - 当后果变得真实 8:47 - 接下来是什么 9:35 - 辅助不等于自动化 14:31 - 预训练是问题所在吗? 15:43 - RLVR与Sutton的苦涩教训

11:47

David Abitbol, who leads AI operations at Revolut, shares data from 2,000 engineers on what AI tools did to coding time and lead time, and why self-hosting open-source GLM models made the biggest difference: about 60-70% faster delivery at roughly a tenth of what they were paying frontier labs. He covers the GPUs needed, the latency targets that keep engineers happy, the tuning that made the same hardware 88% faster, and how an EU-regulated bank keeps it compliant. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:36 Who Revolut is 1:18 What AI did to 2,000 engineers' lead time 2:45 Why they started self-hosting 3:33 Coding isn't the bottleneck 4:24 What it takes to self-host GLM 5:46 Tuning: same GPUs, 88% faster 7:06 The parameters that matter 8:14 Production setup 9:23 For the CIO: compliance and safety David Abitbol https://www.revolut.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

21:32

Temporal's State of Development survey found that 80.8% of engineers use agents daily, but only 49.1% run them in production. Developer advocate Shy Ruparel walks through the four gaps behind that number (usage vs. production, trust vs. reality, prototype vs. enterprise, seeing vs. recovering), then demos a $2,500 payout workflow with a local model that survives having its workers killed mid-flight, without losing state, repeating tool calls or re-spending tokens. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:34 Finance runs on long-running workflows 2:05 The State of Development survey 3:16 Gap 1: Usage vs. production 4:33 Gap 2: Trust vs. reality 7:18 Gap 3: Prototype vs. enterprise 8:55 Gap 4: Seeing vs. recovering 10:53 Demo: a payout that survives a crash 13:06 Durable execution explained 18:12 What the demo solved 20:10 Who runs this in production 20:50 Wrap-up Shy Ruparel https://temporal.io Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

14:51

Code generation is moving faster than ever, and the bottleneck has moved to review. Cole Gannaway, a solutions engineer at Qodo, shows how a one-line data model change that passes every test can quietly break web, mobile, CLI and MCP clients, and how a software graph of your repos reveals that blast radius. He covers turning tribal knowledge and PR comments into custom rules, bringing review context in before code is written, why the agent that wrote the code shouldn't grade it, and checking PRs against the original ticket. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:59 Review is the new bottleneck 2:03 A one-line change that passes every check 3:35 The hidden blast radius 4:15 Building a software graph 4:56 Custom rules and tribal knowledge 5:47 Context before code is written 6:29 Don't let the writer grade its own code 8:20 Turning PR comments into rules 10:06 Q&A: catching the wrong intent 13:55 Wrap-up Cole Gannaway https://www.qodo.ai Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:53

Coding agents are opening PRs faster than anyone can review them. Manish Kapur (Sonar) and Addy Osmani (Anthropic) discuss "light" vs. "dark" software factories, how Anthropic scaled from about 2,500 to 30,000 merged changes a day with Claude doing first-pass review backed by real verification evidence, new data from Sonar's State of Code survey, and why every loop in the factory needs independent, multi-layered verification. They close with a lightning round on labeling agent-written PRs and when it's safe to merge. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 1:57 Throughput is up, merges are failing 2:49 Light vs. dark software factories 3:51 Coding is solved, confidence isn't 5:38 How Anthropic reviews 30,000 changes a day 8:29 State of Code survey findings 9:20 Where the next gains come from 11:38 Multi-layered verification 13:19 Controls, permissions and sandboxes 14:41 Lightning round 17:40 Takeaways Manish Kapur https://www.sonarsource.com Addy Osmani https://x.com/addyosmani https://www.anthropic.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

14:10

Pattern-based SAST catches bad code, but not valid code with flawed intent: broken access control, business logic gaps and authentication holes. Taylor Luttrell-Williams of Sonar introduces the SonarQube Hunter Agent, which maps a repo, runs three specialist agents and adversarially validates every finding, and announces Sonar joining the OpenAI Daybreak cyber partner program. The live demo turns up 46 issues in a Python app, including a user who can make themselves admin and an MFA bypass. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:46 Why SAST misses intent bugs 2:37 How Hunter Agent works 4:12 Sonar joins OpenAI Daybreak 5:44 Layering SAST and Hunter Agent 6:27 Demo: running a scan 8:29 46 findings across three classes 10:01 Inside a broken access control bug 12:26 Scheduled scans 13:12 Automatic remediation Taylor Luttrell-Williams https://www.sonarsource.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

16:29

Most teams spin up a new open model with the default vLLM recipe and hope for the best. Runpod forward-deployed engineer Chris Vela shows how to choose configs from data instead, starting with the use case and concurrency, and demos BenchPod, a benchmarking dashboard built on vLLM that tests configs live without restarts. He runs Kimi K3 on a B300, shows how tuning max batch tokens cuts inter-token latency, and asks whether you need a frontier model at all. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:29 What Runpod does 1:32 Everyone's guessing at vLLM configs 2:53 Version and CUDA gotchas 3:48 BenchPod: benchmarking on top of vLLM 6:07 Running Kimi K3 on a B300 7:40 Demo 10:01 Tuning max batch tokens 13:34 From R&D to production 14:21 Do you need the frontier model? Chris Vela https://www.runpod.io Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:35

When an agent sends an invoice using your token, who actually made the request? Kamil Potrec of Keycard breaks down how agents get credentials today (personal tokens, static keys, over-privileged service accounts) and what proper agent auth requires: per-agent identity, delegation, short-lived scoped credentials, federation with legacy systems, policy and audit. He compares SDKs and gateways for keeping credentials out of an agent's reach, including the gateway tradeoffs. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:43 How agents get credentials today 3:46 What's wrong with this picture 5:15 Using OAuth for agents 7:10 Why it gets hard at scale 8:21 What proper agent auth needs 9:52 One request, many steps 11:16 Why SDKs aren't enough 12:37 Gateways: keep credentials away from agents 14:55 Gateway tradeoffs 16:24 How Keycard approaches it 17:26 Takeaways Kamil Potrec https://keycard.ai Agent Baseline: https://agentbaseline.org Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

21:47

Frontier AI has made every attacker a level more dangerous, and on average, exploits now land before the patch. Patrick Smyth of Chainguard covers this year's AI-assisted attacks and supply chain malware waves, why 30-day remediation windows no longer hold up, the four attack surfaces to cover (malware, known CVEs, zero days and "side doors" like CI/CD, developer laptops and agent skills), and what to do now: cooldown periods, faster CVE fixes, and signing everything with SLSA and Sigstore. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:58 AI-powered attacks this year 2:33 Exploits now arrive before patches 3:45 Why 30-day remediation fails 4:59 A wave of supply chain malware 6:44 The eternal September 8:11 The core supply chain problem 9:12 What to do this year 11:19 Four attack surfaces 13:56 How Chainguard tackles each one 17:01 Sign everything: SLSA and Sigstore 19:16 Hardening agent skills 20:22 Wrap-up Patrick Smyth https://www.chainguard.dev Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

20:06

Arize's in-product agent Alex went from a 2023 prototype that was "50% hallucination" to a single agent with planning, memory and on-demand skills, all built with custom harness code instead of a framework. AI PM Fuad Ali covers each decision: moving the plan into the harness, making "finish" an explicit gate, treating large tool results like files, why one 8,000-character memory file per user beat vector stores and knowledge graphs, merging 10 specialists into one agent, and using production sessions as tests. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:53 Agents all the way down 2:56 What Alex does 4:15 Timeline: 2023 to 2026 6:19 Who owns the plan? 8:33 What ends a turn? 9:44 Memory: treat big results like files 12:10 One small file beat a knowledge graph 13:33 Specialists vs. one agent 14:13 The newest model isn't always best 15:28 Production sessions as tests 17:46 What still needs a human 18:31 What survived every rebuild Fuad Ali https://arize.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

14:38

Classic tool-calling agents fill their context with tool catalogs and raw outputs. Code mode gives the agent a sandbox and lets it search for and compose tools in code, returning only what it needs. Mikyo King, head of open source at Arize AI, explains why code mode works, how Arize built it into Phoenix (Bash, a Python sandbox, SQL and even UI control), its hidden costs (secrets, permissions, durability, double sandboxing), and how Harbor evals showed 43% fewer tokens and 31% lower cost. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:36 The line between engineers and everyone else is dissolving 1:52 The classic tool-calling agent 3:03 What is code mode? 4:37 Why code mode works 6:11 How Phoenix uses code mode 8:19 The hidden costs of code mode 10:42 Open problems 11:44 Evaluating code mode with Harbor 12:55 Results: 43% fewer tokens, 31% lower cost 13:59 Takeaways Mikyo King https://arize.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:56

In 2020, Citibank accidentally sent about $900 million to Revlon’s lenders instead of an $8 million interest payment, even though the procedure, the warning pop-up and three approvers all did what they were supposed to. John Feminella, who works on AI architecture and engineering at Two Sigma, uses that story to show how to give AI agents real autonomy without locking everything down. He walks through five composable controls: an agent registry, risk-based review, tool access that follows an agent’s declared purpose, shared firm-wide evals, and classifiers that send humans only the approvals that matter. Views are his own, not Two Sigma’s. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:43 When controls fail 1:03 The $900M Revlon payment mistake 4:58 What this has to do with AI agents 5:22 Humans aren’t deterministic either 6:07 Approaches that don’t work 7:32 Control 1: An agent registry 9:47 Control 2: Risk-based review 11:47 Control 3: Tools follow purpose 14:42 Control 4: Shared evals 16:17 Control 5: Ending approval fatigue 18:07 Putting it all together 18:32 Why cars have brakes John Feminella https://www.twosigma.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:13

Nobody would hire a worker with no ID, no manager and shared passwords, yet that's how most companies deploy AI agents. Tim Tyler of Gravitee presents the Agent Accountability framework, which governs agents like a digital workforce in three stages: Assignment (identity, team, a named human sponsor), Alignment (role, mission and least-privilege authority) and Administration (oversight scorecards, guardian agents and step-by-step recourse when agents go off course). Chapters: 0:00 The job posting nobody would accept 1:15 Agents as a digital workforce 2:27 Assignment: identity, team and sponsor 6:00 Alignment: role and mission 7:37 Authority and lowest scope 9:34 Never assume alignment 11:17 Administration: oversight scorecards 13:35 Agents need micromanagers 14:21 Recourse when agents go wrong 17:05 Recap Tim Tyler https://www.gravitee.io Agent Accountability Framework: https://agentaccountabilityframework.org Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

16:38

Runlayer is a company of about 60 people running 300+ agents every day. Founding engineer Aiden Sochowski shares what they found once they put a gateway in front of everything and logged every session and tool call: prompt injection through email, PR-review agents getting talked into approvals, over-permissioned bots, one poisoned agent contaminating others, buggy vibe-coded MCP servers burning tokens, and a model switch that raised costs over 100x in a week. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:25 Zero visibility into company agents 1:22 300 agents for 60 people 3:38 Example: data exfiltration through email 6:16 Attacks that unfold over a whole session 8:50 Using session data to scope agents down 10:56 One poisoned agent affects them all 12:47 Beyond security: broken MCP servers 14:08 Cost blowups from model switches 15:36 Wrap-up Aiden Sochowski https://runlayer.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

23:23

At Optiver, a change rolled out to traders shows up in P&L within hours, so AI has to move fast and still be measurable. Noyan Tokgozoglu, head of AI Engineering, walks through Optiver's on-prem AI platform: an inference gateway for routing and budgets, same-day adoption of new frontier models benchmarked on internal golden sets, a model- and harness-agnostic "meta harness", and how they got AI spend back under control after the summer's big model releases. Chapters: 0:00 Intro 0:22 What a market maker does 1:00 Feedback in hours, not quarters 2:53 Platform principles 5:11 The AI platform stack 7:06 Shipping frontier models the same day 8:31 Staying model and harness agnostic 9:53 Getting AI spend under control 13:54 Meeting users where they are 16:11 Q&A Noyan Tokgozoglu https://optiver.com Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

53:05

In this workshop, Fuad Ali of Arize AI shows how to build a self-improvement loop for AI agents: trace everything, let Signal (an always-on agent) read your traces on a schedule and file deduplicated issues, turn failures into evals and living regression datasets, run experiments to prove a fix works, and keep humans at the highest-leverage points: eval design, dataset curation and reviewing fixes. He demos the loop on a toy-shopping agent with a planted bug and takes questions on evaluating qualitative output, decision models and cost. Chapters 00:00 Intro and workshop setup 05:42 Where is your team on the maturity curve? 07:39 The loop: trace, signal, eval, experiment, fix 08:46 Demo agent and tracing 12:15 Signal: an always-on agent reading your traces 16:11 Agent Studio and managed agents 18:31 Turning failures into datasets 20:32 Evals: code, LLM as a judge, decision models 24:48 Creating an eval from a Signal issue 27:01 Experiments: proving the fix works 31:12 Keeping humans in the loop 34:16 Toward a fully automated loop 40:16 Q&A: evaluating qualitative output 48:21 Q&A: decision models, data sources and cost Fuad Ali, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

56:01

Xander Song, an engineer at Arize AI who works on Phoenix, introduces Harbor, an open source framework for evaluating agents on realistic tasks with real data in isolated sandboxes. He explains tasks, Docker environments, verifiers and rewards, trials and jobs, oracles that validate your setup before you spend tokens, and ATIF trajectories. Then he shows how his team runs Harbor at scale on Daytona and with Phoenix to test a prompt change that steered agents toward a new SQL tool, cutting tool calls without hurting correctness. Chapters 00:00 Intro: shipping on evidence, not vibes 01:28 What Harbor is 03:37 Architecture: tasks, environments, verifiers 06:08 Trajectories, jobs and oracles 07:58 Example: fixing a failing migration 10:48 Verifiers as black-box integration tests 14:21 Running at scale in parallel sandboxes 17:04 Harbor with Phoenix 20:37 How the Phoenix team uses Harbor 25:07 Q&A: how Harbor orchestrates runs 29:24 Q&A: complex systems and data size 33:21 Case study: steering agents to a SQL tool 38:34 Demo: datasets and experiments in Phoenix 44:10 Demo: comparing jobs task by task 48:31 Regression tests and skills Xander Song, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:27

Daksh Gupta, co-founder of Greptile, which reviews about 1% of all pull requests on GitHub, shares what Greptile tells companies that want to build their own review agent. Starting from a simple sandbox-plus-webhook setup, he explains why it misses bugs, costs $3-25 per PR and floods you with nitpicks, then walks through the fixes: targeted prompts, a dataset of past incident PRs, model inversion (reviewing Claude-written code with GPT and vice versa catches about 10% more bugs), codebase context and a living wiki, autonomous testing in sandboxes with computer use, and routing cheaper models to most subtasks. Chapters 00:00 Intro: Greptile and why companies build their own 01:22 What makes a great review agent 02:38 The simple version: sandbox, agent, webhook 03:55 What goes wrong 06:02 Fix 1: Better prompts and fewer nitpicks 07:44 Fix 2: A dataset of historical PRs 09:02 Fix 3: Model inversion 11:04 Fix 4: Codebase context 12:36 Docs, tickets and a living wiki 14:26 Fix 5: Autonomous testing with computer use 16:05 Fix 6: Cheaper models for most subtasks Daksh Gupta, Greptile Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

19:44

Jack Wotherspoon, developer experience engineer at Google DeepMind, introduces Gemini Managed Agents: coding agents that run in cloud sandboxes from a single API call instead of on your laptop. He covers the Interactions API, the Antigravity harness, environments that several agents can share, uploaded skills and AGENTS.md files, a proxy that keeps secrets out of the sandbox, scheduled triggers and multi-agent workflows. Demos include an SEC filing researcher handing its work to a quant agent, and a stock research app built in AI Studio. Chapters 00:00 Intro: what are managed agents? 00:54 Why run agents in the cloud 02:13 Doing it yourself vs one API call 03:26 The Interactions API 04:32 How it works under the hood 05:22 Building blocks: harness, environment, skills, credentials, triggers 07:02 Choosing models, including Gemini 4 Argon 08:51 Interactions and environments 10:46 Tools, MCP servers and file mounts 12:21 Keeping secrets out of the sandbox 13:12 Triggers and scheduled agents 13:37 Multi-agent workflows 14:32 Demo: SEC research to quant analysis to report 16:34 Demo: managed agents inside an app 17:44 Getting started in AI Studio Jack Wotherspoon, Google DeepMind Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

20:55

Jesse Hall of LiveKit shows how to build voice agents for financial services that feel human, not robotic. He explains why model leaderboards mislead (they score components, but you ship a conversation), why you should measure time to first audio and time to first sentence instead of first byte or first token, and how async tool calls keep a conversation flowing while slow back-end work runs. He also covers audio-aware turn detection, the roughly 1.5-second latency budget (500-600ms feels truly human), and benchmarking your own stack with simulated callers. Chapters 00:00 Intro: real-time agents vs background agents 01:47 Humanlike voice agents for financial services 03:46 LiveKit and the voice pipeline 04:21 Cascaded pipelines vs speech-to-speech 05:05 Why leaderboards don't pick your stack 06:46 Time to first audio, not first byte 07:52 Time to first sentence, not first token 08:38 Hiding slow tool calls like a human would 10:14 Demo: hotel booking agent 12:33 Turn detection: knowing when to listen 14:02 The latency budget 15:44 Benchmarking your stack with simulated callers 18:35 Results and a pre-launch checklist Jesse Hall, LiveKit Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

35:20

A hands-on workshop from SallyAnn DeLucia, head of product at Arize AI, on moving from vibe checks to real evals. She covers what an eval is and how it differs from a unit test, the main types (LLM as a judge, decision models, code evals, annotations, agent as a judge), how to read a trace, how to write concrete pass/fail criteria, and how to build and iterate on an LLM judge in Arize's prompt playground. Chapters 00:00 Intro and agenda 02:06 Why vibe checks don't scale 03:08 Is an eval just a unit test? 04:13 Why agents make evals harder 05:15 Types of evals 07:29 Workshop setup 10:16 Exploring the travel agent's traces 14:20 How to read a trace 19:03 Defining what good means 22:02 Writing pass/fail criteria 25:19 Building a dataset from traces 26:53 Building and testing an LLM judge 32:08 Next steps: alignment, online evals, Signal SallyAnn DeLucia, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

15:28

Aparna Dhinakaran of Arize AI revisits what an AI engineer actually does as the field moves from writing features to running factories of agents. The job now is building the loop: evals that review non-deterministic work, telemetry that agents consume, and agents that act on it. She walks through how Arize built Signal, an always-on agent that reads traces, remembers past issues and opens PRs, covering triggers, sandboxes, durable state, and evaluating the evaluators. Chapters 00:00 Intro: what does an AI engineer do? 00:38 Karpathy's funnel: who's running thousands of agents 01:45 Rising abstraction, from code to agent factories 02:23 Then vs now: build the loop, not the feature 03:31 Signal: an always-on agent for your traces 04:45 Agents are now the main consumers of telemetry 05:19 What triggers an always-on agent 06:01 Inside a run: context, sandbox, proxy 07:11 What persists and what gets torn down 08:13 Designing durable agents 09:14 Model and harness agnostic 10:21 Writing evals, and evaluating the evaluators 12:48 Trace everything, including your coding agents 14:17 Closing the gap between labs and businesses Aparna Dhinakaran, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

17:57

An AI analyst at a firm like Bridgewater needs private documents, but every email, memo and research note carries its own permissions. Aaron Linsky (head of product engineering, Bridgewater Associates) explains why the Vault's 100 million permissioned documents broke their first search setup, and Nikhil Benesch (CTO, turbopuffer) breaks down the fix: post-filtering loses recall, pre-filtering is too slow, and "native filtering" over a clustered vector index gets both, delivering about 120ms P90 searches across 400 million vectors. Chapters 00:00 Intro: why permissions matter for AI analysts 02:07 Bridgewater's research process 03:43 The Vault: 100M documents, many permissions 05:14 Modeling permissions, and where it broke 06:25 What turbopuffer is 08:01 Napkin math: why brute force fails at scale 09:43 How vector indexes work 11:50 Permissions break the index 12:19 Post-filtering vs pre-filtering 14:09 Native filtering: the best of both 15:23 Results: 120ms across 100M documents 15:47 Writing permission filters in practice 17:00 Beyond permissions: isolation-native search Aaron Linsky, Bridgewater Associates Nikhil Benesch, turbopuffer Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

19:38

Some of the most important financial data sits behind logins and anti-bot walls, with no API. Jay Sahnan and Arik Bird of Browserbase show how browser agents solve this through three case studies: Ramp fetching receipts at scale (over 30,000 manual hours saved), Bill paying across thousands of different vendor portals with one agent, and Stripe automating KYC checks. They also cover how Browserbase forked Chromium to run reliably in the cloud, and how Stagehand's act, extract and observe primitives keep automations from breaking when sites change. Chapters 00:00 Intro 00:27 What is a browser agent? 01:37 Ramp, Bill and Stripe: data on the hardest-to-reach web 02:13 Ramp: fetching receipts at scale 03:34 Why browsers get blocked in the data center 06:03 Forking Chromium for the cloud 07:49 Demo: 100 browsers at once 10:11 Bill: one agent, thousands of portals 11:08 Stagehand vs Playwright 14:52 Stripe: automating KYC 15:52 Act, extract and observe 16:35 Demo: researching 20 companies in parallel Jay Sahnan, Browserbase Arik Bird, Browserbase Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

20:58

In finance, you never show a figure you can't trace. Vinoo Ganesh, CEO of Kepler (previously Palantir and Citadel), explains Kepler's architecture where models cite numbers but never write them: retrieval finds the source, deterministic code does the math, and a post-processing filter strips any figure that can't be verified. He covers the citation registry built from more than 30 million SEC documents, hybrid search and re-ranking on turbopuffer, tenant isolation, and why plain RAG produced thousands of wrong numbers in their evals. Chapters 00:00 Intro 01:47 Why LLMs and financial numbers don't mix 04:02 Models cite numbers, code does the math 04:30 Building a citation registry from SEC filings 06:03 How Kepler answers a question end to end 08:27 Structuring facts: value, unit, scale, period 09:48 Hybrid search and re-ranking on turbopuffer 11:30 Tenant isolation and security 12:37 Making every number traceable 14:42 Stripping what can't be verified 16:41 What plain RAG gets wrong 18:32 Kepler in action 19:46 Where the guarantees end Vinoo Ganesh, Kepler Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

18:32

Janie Gu, product manager at Google DeepMind leading Kaggle Benchmarks, explains why most AI benchmarks are broken: they don't reflect real work, they're expensive to keep current, and their scores can't be verified. After reproducing 65 industry benchmarks, Kaggle found models reading other models' API keys, rewriting grading scripts, and scores swinging up to 20% between identical runs. Suyeol Yun, head of AI at LinqAlpha, then presents MandateBench, built with Google DeepMind and Kaggle, which grades whether a model can work like a buy-side analyst, from a fund's mandate to a full investment memo. Chapters 00:00 Intro 01:10 Kaggle: from grading humans to grading models 02:52 Why benchmarks are broken 05:25 What reproducing 65 benchmarks revealed 08:20 How Google DeepMind and Kaggle are fixing it 10:20 Why your company should build a benchmark 11:44 LinqAlpha and MandateBench 12:32 Where existing finance benchmarks fall short 13:31 A real analyst task, start to finish 15:33 Grading the reasoning, not just the answer 16:41 Early results 17:18 What's next and how to get involved Janie Gu, Google DeepMind Suyeol Yun, LinqAlpha Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

27:09

Laurie Voss, head of developer relations at Arize AI and co-founder of npm, argues that coding agents made writing code nearly free, so the bottleneck keeps moving: first to code review, then to operations and security. What agents can't take over is finding out what people actually need and defining what "good" means. He calls the job that remains the product engineer, looks at the data on collapsing junior hiring, and lays out what engineering leaders should do now. Chapters 00:00 Intro: beyond the AI engineer 01:19 Code got free, so the bottleneck moved 03:04 8x more code, only 30% faster shipping 04:39 Can machines do code review? 08:02 The theory of constraints 09:00 The next bottlenecks: ops and security 11:21 What agents won't eat: deciding what good means 13:45 Essential complexity and the spec 16:34 The product engineer 19:45 The junior developer problem 22:57 For people who love the craft 25:11 What to do now Laurie Voss, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

19:25

A one-line prompt change made a support agent 17 points safer and 17 points worse at finishing tasks. Sofia Jakovcevic, forward deployed engineer at Arize AI, explains why agents fail at runtime rather than in code, and walks through a five-step regression loop built from production traces: curate datasets, score with evaluators, run baseline experiments, compare changes, and gate merges in CI. Then she shows how to close the loop at agent speed, with coding agents that read traces and fix themselves. Chapters 00:00 Intro: observability for agents 01:08 The real problem: fixes that break other things 02:26 A one-line prompt change: +17 and -17 04:48 Agents fail at runtime, not in code 06:25 The five-step regression loop 06:48 Step 1: Build datasets from production traces 07:50 Step 2: Score with evaluators 09:48 Steps 3-4: Baseline experiments and comparisons 11:14 Step 5: Gate merges in CI 11:48 Demo: experiments in Arise 15:38 Using coding agents and skills 16:12 Closing the loop at agent speed Sofia Jakovcevic, Arize AI Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

16:45

Bridgewater Associates built the Vault: more than 100 million documents from 135 external sources plus the firm's own memos and meetings, cleaned, permissioned and tagged to its internal ontology. Sam Green (team lead, Applied AI) and Aaron Linsky (head of product engineering) share three lessons: humans and agents need different things from search, the biggest wins come from one tool that serves both, and the real prize is agents that proactively bring investors what deserves their attention. Includes how a hand-built benchmark took precision at 10 from about 60% to over 90%. Chapters 00:00 Intro: three lessons from building the Vault 01:11 Bridgewater's 50-year research process 02:35 Why unstructured data needed the same rigor 03:25 What's in the Vault 04:14 Open web vs the Vault: a side-by-side 06:53 Search for humans vs search for agents 08:19 Benchmarking precision: "Vault search is bad" 09:32 Fast filtering at scale 11:35 Getting investors to change their habits 13:02 What the Vault enables: analysts, forecasts, signals 14:05 Proactive agents: the investor workbench 15:44 How the Vault compounds what the firm learns Sam Green, Bridgewater Associates Aaron Linsky, Bridgewater Associates Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制

14:15

Harneet Kaur, founder and CEO of Axim Intelligence and a former distressed credit investor, tests whether frontier models can reason about a live distressed situation: iHeartMedia. Given the same context, two top models disagreed sharply on the odds of bankruptcy versus a negotiated restructuring. Breaking the analysis into checked layers (extraction, derivation, judgment, prediction) brought them to the same answer, which raises a new question: is agreement the same as being right? Chapters 00:00 Intro 00:42 What distressed credit actually means 02:34 Why old scoring models fall short 04:30 What it means to understand a credit 05:46 Can AI predict what happens next? 06:13 Case study: iHeartMedia, and two models disagree 08:01 Benchmarking each layer of reasoning 11:07 Structured reasoning makes the models converge 12:03 Takeaways: convergence vs correctness Harneet Kaur, Axim Intelligence Join us in SF for the second annual AIE CODE summit: https://aie.codes our last flagship summit of 2026. Applications live now!

暂未译制